Young Version — August 1999
An archive project by Flock MFGNew issue alerts →
About this issue
The August 1999 issue of Young Version explores drift setups versus grip tuning through 22 shop demo cars, including S15 Silvias from Mine’s and Kazama Auto. Features cover front-wheel-drive builds taking on high-powered 4WD rivals, choosing a first drift car, and reviving a used AE86 Trueno on a ¥1 million total budget. Suspension fundamentals, engine-oil selection, rotary maintenance, new-parts tests, and reports from Hiroshima and California round out this look at Japan’s late-1990s tuning scene.
242 available scans from Young Version — August 1999, in right-to-left reading order. Japanese OCR and English translation drafts are available throughout. Drafts have not received exhaustive image proofreading; unreadable source remains recorded in the archival data.
Page 68 — English draft translation
With the same tuning setup, the S15 Silvia is definitely faster than the S14. As the adjacent article about Yasio Factory’s project car shows, simply raising the boost pushed it past 340 [PS]. Yet the engine is still the same SR20DET as in the S14, apparently with the N-side variable valve timing. So why is it quicker? Nissan’s new-model technical guide does not explain it. There is a rumor that the camshaft profile changed (and that the cams differ between early and late PS13 and S14 models, too). But the most likely explanation is the turbo specification. Nissan’s launch materials only say that the S15 adopted a high-efficiency turbo. The S13’s S14 turbo is a popular swap, but if the stock S15 turbo performs better, it ought to work in an S14 as well!
The housing shape has changed. But from the outside, the only visible difference from the S14 stock turbo is a divider-like piece near the actuator swing valve. The housing itself appears unchanged in size, and the blade count and angles also seem unchanged (only the blade material changed to Inconel). You’d normally think that alone couldn’t make a difference in power. However, YV’s own investigation uncovered new information from an industry source: compared with the S14 turbo, the S15 turbo’s actuator bypass passage is machined 1.6 mm wider in diameter. We also heard that otherwise they are virtually identical. But can that really change both power and feel? We’ll have to fit stock S15 turbos to S13 and S14 cars and find out.
In the May issue, the car produced 341.0 PS and 46.7 kg·m at 1.3 kg/cm² boost after replacing the intake and exhaust components plus the ECU. For context, only the intercooler and airflow meter (a stock Z32 unit) had been changed; the injectors and fuel pump were still stock. It now has a bolt-on GT2540, but next issue it’s set to evolve into a surprising, original secret setup!
Captions and page details
Let’s compare
and see!
(R)PS13 stock
C201
GARR
G.80
S14 stock
GARRE
S15 stock
The exhaust-side housing shape has changed!
Shape
exhaust side
of the
housing
。
Yasio’s car made 341 PS with only a boost increase!
That’s a big surprise!
The secret hidden in the exhaust housing!
rOLKEN
Yasio’s car, tuned alongside the series in YV.
On both the S14 and S15 turbos, the compressor-side housing appears identical in size and shape. If so, the difference must be…
On the S15 stock turbo, there’s a divider between the exhaust-side actuator bypass and the turbine blades. The reversed GARRETT lettering is suspicious, too!
70